Report Information
Leslie Knope
March 20, 2026
23andMe
1.0
About This Report

This report analyzes your genotyping data from 23andMe. and presents Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) for 19 traits across 6 health categories. Each PRS reflects the cumulative effect of hundreds to thousands of common genetic variants associated with a trait in large population studies, primarily the UK Biobank.

What is a Polygenic Risk Score? A PRS is not a diagnosis. It quantifies statistical predisposition. Your genetic profile is one of many factors influencing health, alongside lifestyle, environment, and medical history. Most traits are only modestly influenced by genetics; a high PRS increases the statistical probability of a condition but does not predict with certainty that you will develop it.

How to read this report:

  • Percentile — where your genetic score sits in the population. The 50th percentile is average; above 80th is considered elevated.
  • Odds ratio (OR) — for disease traits, how your odds compare to the population average. An OR of 1.5 means roughly 50% higher odds than average.
  • "About Average" — when the 95% confidence interval includes 1.0, the difference from average is not statistically meaningful and the result is labeled About Average.
  • Estimated lifetime risk — for disease traits, an approximate lifetime probability derived from your odds ratio and UK Biobank population prevalence. This is a statistical estimate, not a clinical prediction.
  • Top contributing variants — each score card has an expandable section showing the individual genetic variants that contribute most to your score. These are the variants with the largest effect on your personal result, but they are not necessarily causal. Polygenic scores combine hundreds to thousands of variants, each contributing a small amount. The listed variants simply had the largest individual weight in your calculation.
  • Effect-size distribution — each score card also includes an expandable chart showing how the trait measurement or odds ratio varies across PRS percentile bins in the reference population. Your bin is highlighted. These charts help you understand the magnitude of the genetic effect: a steep curve means the score strongly differentiates risk across the population, while a flat curve means genetics plays a smaller role for that trait.
Important: This report is for research and educational purposes only and is not a clinical diagnostic test. Consult a healthcare provider or genetic counselor before making any health decisions based on this information.
Ancestry note: All polygenic scores in this report were developed from European-ancestry data (UK Biobank). Percentile estimates are calibrated against a European-ancestry reference population. Results are less accurate and should be interpreted with extra caution for individuals of non-European ancestry.
Results Summary
Data source: 23andMe  · Leslie Knope
5
Elevated Risk
6
About Average
8
Below Average

95 th pct
Tends to burn rather than tan
This score reflects your genetic tendency to burn rather than tan in the sun. A higher score means you are more likely to never tan and only burn.
OR 6.05 (95% CI 5.65–6.45)
94 th pct
Taller than average
Height in centimeters
93 th pct
Higher likelihood of red hair
This score indicates your genetic likelihood of having red hair.
OR 143.00 (95% CI 112.00–185.00)
88 th pct
Higher grip strength than average
Right-hand grip strength
85 th pct
Higher likelihood of blonde hair
This score predicts your likelihood of having blonde hair based on your genes.
OR 6.20 (95% CI 5.60–6.90)
2 th pct
Lower likelihood of dark brown hair
This score estimates your likelihood of having dark brown hair based on your genetics.
OR 0.05 (95% CI 0.04–0.06)
2 th pct
Lower likelihood of black hair
This score predicts your likelihood of having black hair based on genetics.
OR 0.08 (95% CI 0.02–0.15)
2 th pct
Lower likelihood of brown hair
This score predicts your likelihood of having brown hair based on your genes.
OR 0.10 (95% CI 0.09–0.11)
Polygenic Physical & Personal Traits
Appearance & Body 3 2 elevated 1 below avg
Hair Color Tendency
Polygenic scores for individual hair color categories

These scores reflect your genetic predisposition toward each hair color category independently. A higher percentile indicates a stronger genetic tendency for that color.

Light brown hair
95th pct
Red hair
93th pct
Blonde hair
85th pct
Brown hair
2th pct
Black hair
2th pct
Dark brown hair
2th pct
Light brown hair effect-size distribution
1.01.74 -0.08 You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile
Red hair effect-size distribution
1.0221.8 -35.9 You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile
Blonde hair effect-size distribution
1.020.2 -3.31 You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile
Brown hair effect-size distribution
1.02.29 -0.28 You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile
Black hair effect-size distribution
1.019.2 -3.18 You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile
Dark brown hair effect-size distribution
1.04.49 -0.70 You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile
Height
Standing height
High
Taller than average

Adult height is one of the most heritable human traits, with genetics explaining roughly 80% of the variation. Hundreds of genetic variants each make small contributions to your final height, alongside nutrition and health during childhood.

Your score for Height is in the top 20%, indicating an elevated genetic predisposition.

20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
94th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
View as:
Percentile average: 5'9" (175.4 cm) (95% CI 5'9" – 5'9") · Population mean: 5'7" (169.8 cm)
Estimated male height: 5'11" (181.1 cm) (95% CI 5'11" – 5'11") · Male population mean: 5'9" (175.5 cm)
Estimated female height: 5'6" (168.1 cm) (95% CI 5'6" – 5'6") · Female population mean: 5'4" (162.5 cm)
Effect size across PRS percentile bins
5'7" 6'5" 4'10" Height You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Effect size per PRS decile, reference line at population mean (5'7", 169.8 cm). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
3:185548683:G:A rs720390 1/1 0.3944 2.00 Intergenic
6:19839415:C:T rs41271299 0/1 0.6870 1.00 ID4 Intronic
15:100692953:G:A rs72755233 0|1 -0.5392 1.00 ADAMTS17 Missense
4:18025484:G:A rs2011603 1|1 -0.2370 2.00 LCORL Upstream
11:75276178:A:C rs606452 1/1 -0.2352 2.00 SERPINH1 Intronic
15:67457698:A:G rs35874463 0/1 0.4458 1.00 SMAD3 Missense
20:34025756:A:G rs143384 0/1 0.4271 1.00 GDF5 5-prime UTR
12:69827658:G:T rs10748128 1/1 0.2053 2.00 Intergenic
6:130349119:C:T rs6569648 1/1 -0.1934 2.00 L3MBTL3 Intronic
12:66359752:C:A rs8756 1/1 -0.1905 2.00 HMGA2 3-prime UTR
BMI
Body mass index (BMI)
Below Average
Lower BMI than average

BMI (body mass index) is a common measure of body size calculated from height and weight. While it does not distinguish between fat and muscle mass, it is a useful screening tool. Both genetics and lifestyle influence BMI.

Your score for BMI falls somewhat below the population average.

20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
32th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Percentile average: 27.2 kg/m² (95% CI 27.1 – 27.3 kg/m²) · Population mean: 28.0 kg/m²
Effect size across PRS percentile bins
28.0 39.0 21.4 kg/m² You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Effect size per PRS decile, reference line at population mean (28.0 kg/m²). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
16:53800954:T:C rs1421085 1/0 0.3454 1.00 FTO Intronic
2:637830:A:G rs13393304 1|1 0.1410 2.00 Intergenic
3:49924940:T:C rs1062633 1|1 0.1143 2.00 MST1R Missense
19:47569003:G:A rs3810291 1/1 0.1136 2.00 ZC3H4 3-prime UTR
16:4013467:C:T rs2531995 1/1 0.1046 2.00 ADCY9 3-prime UTR
4:100239319:T:C rs1229984 1|1 0.0892 2.00 ADH1B Missense
11:27701365:G:A rs10835211 1/1 0.0826 2.00 BDNF Intronic
2:622827:T:C rs2867125 1/1 0.0765 2.00 Intergenic
14:25930988:C:A rs8015400 1|1 0.0706 2.00 Intergenic
16:20370810:C:T rs9652588 1|1 -0.0702 2.00 PDILT Missense
Ease of Skin Tanning
Ease of skin tanning (never tan, only burn)
High
Tends to burn rather than tan

Skin tanning ability reflects how your skin responds to UV radiation. People who burn easily and tan poorly have less protective melanin and higher risk of skin cancer. Variants in pigmentation genes like MC1R strongly influence this trait.

Your score for Ease of Skin Tanning is in the top 20%, indicating an elevated genetic predisposition.

20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
95th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Odds ratio vs. population average Score bin: [0% - 10%]
0.3× 1.0 avg 3.0×
OR 6.05   95% CI 5.65 – 6.45
Odds ratio across PRS percentile bins
1.0 7.71 -1.09 Odds ratio You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Odds ratio per PRS decile vs. population average (OR = 1.0, dashed). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
16:89986117:C:T rs1805007 0/1 1.0449 1.00 MC1R Missense
15:28365618:A:G rs12913832 1/1 0.3890 2.00 HERC2 Intronic
16:89985844:G:T rs1805005 0/1 0.4156 1.00 MC1R Missense
11:89017961:G:A rs1126809 1|0 0.2996 1.00 TYR Missense
9:16864521:C:T rs2153271 1/1 0.1203 2.00 BNC2 Intronic
11:88911696:C:A rs1042602 1/0 0.1579 1.00 TYR Missense
11:68855363:G:A rs3829241 1|1 0.0604 2.00 TPCN2 Missense
1:66921933:G:A rs1772131 1|1 0.0540 2.00 Intergenic
20:32738612:C:T rs1015362 0/1 -0.1023 1.00 Intergenic
8:116586460:C:T rs3779881 1|1 -0.0501 2.00 TRPS1 Intronic
Polygenic Health Scores
Cardiovascular 1 1 average
Heart attack
Myocardial infarction
About Average
Typical heart attack risk

A heart attack (myocardial infarction) occurs when blood flow to part of the heart muscle is blocked, usually by a blood clot in a coronary artery. Family history is one of the strongest risk factors, alongside high cholesterol, blood pressure, smoking, and diabetes.

Your score for Heart attack falls somewhat below the population average.

~3.9%
(95% CI 3.4%–4.5%)
Your estimated lifetime risk
3.5%
Population average
Estimated from UK Biobank prevalence × odds ratio (UKB reference: n=378,066, ages 40–69). Not a clinical prediction.
20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
37th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Odds ratio vs. population average Score bin: (60% - 70%)
0.3× 1.0 avg 3.0×
OR 1.11   95% CI 0.96 – 1.30   CI includes 1.0 — not significantly different from average
Odds ratio across PRS percentile bins
1.0 2.64 0.26 Odds ratio You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Odds ratio per PRS decile vs. population average (OR = 1.0, dashed). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
12:111884608:T:C rs3184504 1/0 -0.0686 1.00 SH2B3 Missense
1:222923351:A:G rs6683071 1/1 0.0333 2.00 FAM177B Missense
1:109822166:G:A rs599839 1/1 0.0317 2.00 CELSR2 Downstream
17:66449122:G:A rs883541 1/1 0.0283 2.00 WIPI1 Missense
9:22115959:A:G rs2383207 0/1 0.0524 1.00 CDKN2B-AS1 Intronic
7:35291491:G:A rs73099187 1|1 -0.0244 2.00 TBX20 Intronic
1:222826481:G:A rs2291832 1|1 0.0239 2.00 MIA3 Intronic
2:106823652:C:T rs13006272 1|1 -0.0227 2.00 Intergenic
7:129663496:C:T rs11556924 0/1 -0.0401 1.00 ZC3HC1 Missense
2:196851911:G:A rs10931715 1|1 0.0190 2.00 DNAH7 Missense
Metabolic & Hormonal 1 1 average
Type 2 diabetes
Type 2 diabetes (T2D)
About Average
Typical type 2 diabetes risk

Type 2 diabetes occurs when the body becomes resistant to insulin or the pancreas cannot produce enough. It is the most common form of diabetes, closely linked to obesity, physical inactivity, and family history. Early detection and lifestyle changes can significantly reduce risk.

Your score for Type 2 diabetes falls somewhat below the population average.

~9.3%
(95% CI 6.7%–12.6%)
Your estimated lifetime risk
10.3%
Population average
Estimated from UK Biobank prevalence × odds ratio (UKB reference: n=378,066, ages 40–69). Not a clinical prediction.
20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
36th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Odds ratio vs. population average Score bin: (60% - 70%)
0.3× 1.0 avg 3.0×
OR 0.89   95% CI 0.63 – 1.25   CI includes 1.0 — not significantly different from average
Odds ratio across PRS percentile bins
1.0 2.76 0.08 Odds ratio You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Odds ratio per PRS decile vs. population average (OR = 1.0, dashed). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
5:169310213:A:C rs17646221 1|1 0.0474 2.00 FAM196B Missense
22:50752150:C:T rs68178377 1|1 0.0376 2.00 DENND6B Missense
11:64124515:T:C rs612448 1|1 -0.0338 2.00 CCDC88B Missense
9:22137685:T:G rs7018475 1/1 0.0297 2.00 Intergenic
12:6948468:T:C rs1129649 1|1 0.0275 2.00 LEPREL2 Loss of Function
4:37910836:G:A rs2925951 1|1 -0.0274 2.00 TBC1D1 Intronic
3:183800463:G:A rs7648737 1|1 -0.0242 2.00 RP11-778D9.9 Loss of Function
9:22132076:A:G rs2383208 0/1 -0.0452 1.00 Intergenic
11:32293377:C:A rs7105928 1|1 -0.0197 2.00 RP1-65P5.1 Intronic
11:8264900:A:G rs437976 1/1 -0.0196 2.00 LMO1 Intronic
Musculoskeletal 1 1 elevated
Hand grip strength
Right hand grip strength
High
Higher grip strength than average

Hand grip strength is a simple but powerful measure of overall muscular strength and health. Lower grip strength has been linked to higher risk of cardiovascular disease, disability, and mortality. Genetics, physical activity, and nutrition all influence it.

Your score for Hand grip strength is in the top 20%, indicating an elevated genetic predisposition.

20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
88th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Percentile average: 33.6 kilograms (95% CI 33.4 – 33.8 kilograms) · Population mean: 32.3 kilograms
Effect size across PRS percentile bins
32.3 43.5 21.3 kilograms You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Effect size per PRS decile, reference line at population mean (32.3 kilograms). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
1:176792249:A:G rs1325598 1|1 0.1395 2.00 PAPPA2 Intronic
15:74336633:T:C rs5742915 1/1 0.1124 2.00 PML Missense
1:41502680:C:A rs1740610 1|1 -0.1035 2.00 SCMH1 Intronic
5:130766662:T:C rs1291602 1|1 0.0984 2.00 RAPGEF6 Missense
20:34025756:A:G rs143384 0/1 0.1563 1.00 GDF5 5-prime UTR
10:70332580:A:G rs10823229 1|1 0.0745 2.00 TET1 Missense
2:224992906:C:T rs988321 1|1 -0.0715 2.00 Regulatory
12:14993439:C:T rs11276 0|1 -0.1397 1.00 ART4 Missense
6:130374102:C:A rs9388768 1|1 -0.0697 2.00 L3MBTL3 Missense
17:43216281:C:T rs4986172 1/1 -0.0683 2.00 ACBD4 Intronic
Respiratory & Sleep 1 1 average
Asthma
Asthma (diagnosed by doctor)
Average
Typical asthma risk

Asthma is a chronic condition in which the airways become inflamed and narrowed, causing wheezing, shortness of breath, and coughing. It often begins in childhood and frequently co-occurs with allergies and eczema. Genetics and environmental exposures both contribute.

Your score for Asthma is near the population average.

~16.5%
(95% CI 15.3%–17.8%)
Your estimated lifetime risk
14.7%
Population average
Estimated from UK Biobank prevalence × odds ratio (UKB reference: n=302,171, ages 40–69). Not a clinical prediction.
20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
57th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Odds ratio vs. population average Score bin: (40% - 50%)
0.3× 1.0 avg 3.0×
OR 1.15   95% CI 1.05 – 1.26
Odds ratio across PRS percentile bins
1.0 3.22 -0.02 Odds ratio You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Odds ratio per PRS decile vs. population average (OR = 1.0, dashed). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
11:76291154:G:A rs61893460 1|1 0.0782 2.00 Intergenic
9:6072597:T:C rs343476 1|1 0.0661 2.00 Intergenic
17:38064469:T:C rs11078928 1|0 -0.0823 1.00 GSDMB Loss of Function
5:110401872:T:C rs1837253 1/0 0.0784 1.00 TSLP Upstream
5:110406742:C:T rs3806933 1/1 -0.0360 2.00 TSLP 5-prime UTR
16:11541896:G:A rs4238608 1/1 -0.0350 2.00 CTD-3088G3.8 Missense
10:9049253:C:T rs12413578 0/1 -0.0691 1.00 Intergenic
5:131901225:A:G rs2244012 0/1 0.0666 1.00 RAD50 Intronic
14:69254191:C:T rs4902647 1|1 -0.0319 2.00 ZFP36L1 Downstream
4:38799710:T:C rs4833095 1/0 -0.0629 1.00 TLR1 Missense
Lifestyle 6 2 average 4 below avg
Chronotype
Chronotype (morning/evening person)
Below Average
More likely to be an evening person

Chronotype describes your body's natural preference for when to sleep and wake. "Morning larks" feel most alert early in the day, while "night owls" peak later. This is strongly influenced by genetics and shifts across the lifespan.

Your score for Chronotype falls somewhat below the population average.

20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
31th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Percentile average: 3.12 (95% CI 3.10 – 3.14) · Population mean: 3.19
Effect size across PRS percentile bins
3.19 4.29 2.26 Effect size You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Effect size per PRS decile, reference line at population mean (3.19). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
1:182569626:T:C rs1144566 1|1 0.0507 2.00 RGS16 Missense
6:55142337:A:G rs2653349 1/1 0.0194 2.00 HCRTR2 Missense
2:77213103:C:T rs7563917 1|1 0.0156 2.00 AC079117.1 Non-coding
7:96468009:G:A rs10254255 1|1 -0.0139 2.00 Intergenic
18:38026570:T:C rs4799549 1|1 0.0112 2.00 Intergenic
17:8108331:A:G rs1059476 1|1 0.0108 2.00 AURKB Missense
2:239306268:A:C rs3739070 0/1 0.0199 1.00 TRAF3IP1 Missense
7:24081855:A:G rs10234716 1|1 0.0099 2.00 Intergenic
3:185990096:C:T rs2193587 1|1 0.0098 2.00 DGKG Missense
22:40554008:T:G rs6001807 1|1 0.0095 2.00 TNRC6B Intronic
Coffee intake
Daily coffee consumption frequency
Below Average
Lower coffee intake than average

How much coffee you drink is partly genetic. Variants in genes that affect caffeine metabolism (like CYP1A2) and caffeine sensitivity influence whether you crave multiple cups a day or find even one too stimulating.

Your score for Coffee intake falls somewhat below the population average.

20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
34th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Percentile average: 3.15 cups per day (95% CI 3.10 – 3.20 cups per day) · Population mean: 3.33 cups per day
Effect size across PRS percentile bins
3.33 5.63 1.22 cups per day You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Effect size per PRS decile, reference line at population mean (3.33 cups per day). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
7:17284577:T:C rs4410790 1/1 0.1128 2.00 Intergenic
7:17430004:C:A rs7777586 1|1 -0.0325 2.00 AC019117.1 Intronic
2:634905:T:C rs6548238 1/1 0.0268 2.00 Regulatory
4:89052323:G:T rs2231142 0/1 -0.0393 1.00 ABCG2 Missense
18:57851763:A:G rs10871777 0/1 0.0361 1.00 Intergenic
1:49910568:G:A rs1167268 1|1 -0.0167 2.00 AGBL4-IT1 Intronic
17:18775900:A:G rs4393623 1|1 0.0149 2.00 PRPSAP2 Missense
2:27730940:T:C rs1260326 1/0 0.0295 1.00 GCKR Missense
12:11338781:C:A rs1669413 1/1 -0.0137 2.00 TAS2R42 Missense
21:30594334:T:C rs2832268 1|1 0.0129 2.00 BACH1 Intronic
Sleep duration
Average hours of sleep per night
Below Average
Shorter sleep duration than average

Sleep duration is partly heritable and varies naturally between individuals. Genes influencing circadian rhythm and sleep-wake signaling contribute to whether you tend to need more or less sleep each night.

Your score for Sleep duration falls somewhat below the population average.

20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
36th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Percentile average: 8.15 hours (95% CI 8.14 – 8.16 hours) · Population mean: 8.20 hours
Effect size across PRS percentile bins
8.20 9.00 7.58 hours You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Effect size per PRS decile, reference line at population mean (8.20 hours). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
2:114090412:A:G rs1823125 0/1 0.0338 1.00 Intergenic
1:34743076:T:G rs1342153 1|1 -0.0086 2.00 RP4-657M3.2 Upstream
14:26974414:A:C rs178189 1|1 0.0082 2.00 NOVA1 Intronic
5:135620850:T:C rs1499767 1|1 -0.0079 2.00 TRPC7 Intronic
1:65250982:T:G rs2483616 1|1 0.0075 2.00 RAVER2 Intronic
16:78420775:G:A rs11545029 1|1 -0.0074 2.00 WWOX Missense
10:70332580:A:G rs10823229 1|1 -0.0070 2.00 TET1 Missense
10:125003630:T:C rs7089041 1|1 -0.0067 2.00 Intergenic
17:4764359:C:T rs8073970 1|1 -0.0064 2.00 MINK1 Intronic
1:31687774:T:C rs6671739 1|1 0.0063 2.00 NKAIN1 Intronic
Alcohol intake frequency
Frequency of alcohol consumption
Below Average
Less frequent alcohol intake than average

Genes involved in alcohol metabolism and reward pathways can influence how frequently a person drinks. Variants in enzymes like ADH and ALDH affect how your body processes alcohol and how it makes you feel.

Your score for Alcohol intake frequency falls somewhat below the population average.

20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
38th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Percentile average: 4.80 categories (95% CI 4.79 – 4.81 categories) · Population mean: 4.84 categories
Effect size across PRS percentile bins
4.84 5.90 3.51 categories You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Effect size per PRS decile, reference line at population mean (4.84 categories). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
4:100239319:T:C rs1229984 1|1 0.2145 2.00 ADH1B Missense
2:27730940:T:C rs1260326 1/0 0.0336 1.00 GCKR Missense
4:184831715:A:G rs2278475 1|1 -0.0130 2.00 STOX2 Intronic
4:172552376:G:A rs1027206 1|1 -0.0120 2.00 RP11-97E7.2 Intronic
11:121801129:T:C rs1666658 1|1 -0.0117 2.00 Regulatory
3:49924940:T:C rs1062633 1|1 -0.0115 2.00 MST1R Missense
10:99713117:T:C rs533358 1|1 -0.0113 2.00 CRTAC1 Intronic
12:54660427:G:A rs57281063 0|1 0.0221 1.00 RP11-968A15.2 Intronic
6:17173376:G:A rs2181349 1|1 0.0109 2.00 Intergenic
10:133978962:T:C rs2172131 1|1 0.0098 2.00 JAKMIP3 Intronic
Facial aging
Facial ageing (looking younger than you are)
About Average
Likely to look your age

How old you look relative to your actual age is partly genetic. Genes involved in skin elasticity, pigmentation, and cellular repair processes influence the rate of facial aging. Sun exposure, smoking, and lifestyle also play major roles.

Your score for Facial aging is near the population average.

~76.0%
(95% CI 74.7%–77.1%)
Your estimated lifetime risk
74.7%
Population average
Estimated from UK Biobank prevalence × odds ratio (UKB reference: n=348,892, ages 40–69). Not a clinical prediction.
20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
60th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Odds ratio vs. population average Score bin: (40% - 50%)
0.3× 1.0 avg 3.0×
OR 1.07   95% CI 1.00 – 1.14   CI includes 1.0 — not significantly different from average
Odds ratio across PRS percentile bins
1.0 2.07 0.30 Odds ratio You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Odds ratio per PRS decile vs. population average (OR = 1.0, dashed). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
8:130699140:T:C rs10956486 1|0 0.0727 1.00 RP11-419K12.1 Upstream
9:16864521:C:T rs2153271 1/1 -0.0346 2.00 BNC2 Intronic
2:145634153:G:A rs6738560 1|1 0.0323 2.00 TEX41 Intronic
9:205964:A:G rs478882 1/1 -0.0307 2.00 Intergenic
20:39832628:T:C rs17265513 1/1 0.0234 2.00 ZHX3 Missense
2:56040099:T:C rs10199082 1|0 -0.0463 1.00 Intergenic
2:219903258:T:G rs6736922 1|1 0.0215 2.00 CCDC108 Loss of Function
6:151579432:C:T rs4869723 0|1 0.0374 1.00 AKAP12 Intronic
1:201314624:A:G rs2153715 1|1 -0.0177 2.00 Intergenic
5:92666066:G:T rs6863143 1|1 0.0168 2.00 Intergenic
Walking pace
Usual walking pace
Average
Average walking pace

Walking pace is a surprisingly strong predictor of overall health and longevity. It reflects cardiovascular fitness, musculoskeletal health, and neurological function. Genetics influence the traits that contribute to walking speed, including muscle composition and body proportions.

Your score for Walking pace is near the population average.

20th
40th
60th
80th
95th
41th percentile (EUR ancestry reference population)
Percentile average: 3.31 meters/second (95% CI 3.30 – 3.32 meters/second) · Population mean: 3.32 meters/second
Effect size across PRS percentile bins
3.32 3.86 2.74 meters/second You 0th 50th 100th PRS percentile

Effect size per PRS decile, reference line at population mean (3.32 meters/second). Error bars: 95% CI. Source: Tanigawa et al. (2023).

Top contributing variants (10)
VariantrsIDGenotype Effect WeightDosageGeneType
3:49936102:T:C rs2230590 1/1 -0.0054 2.00 MST1R Missense
3:184039666:A:G rs2178403 1|1 0.0043 2.00 EIF4G1 Missense
7:113605108:T:C rs12705924 1|1 0.0042 2.00 PPP1R3A Intronic
18:53210302:G:T rs613872 0/1 -0.0083 1.00 TCF4 Intronic
4:182733332:T:C rs4862006 1|1 0.0041 2.00 Intergenic
2:41199040:G:A rs1981804 1|1 0.0041 2.00 Intergenic
1:25015638:C:T rs7511698 1|1 0.0037 2.00 Regulatory
6:137760308:C:T rs9321606 1|1 0.0036 2.00 Intergenic
18:37426101:C:A rs56759062 1|1 -0.0036 2.00 RP11-636O21.1 Intronic
3:88189341:T:C rs7653652 1|1 -0.0036 2.00 ZNF654 Missense
Traits Not Scored

The following trait(s) could not be included because the scoring file had insufficient overlap with your genotype data (less than 50% of variants matched).

  • Ankylosing spondylitis (PGS001267)
Important Disclaimers

Key Genetic Variants

The Key Genetic Variants section screens for individual high-penetrance variants in genes linked to specific health conditions. Unlike polygenic risk scores, a single variant can significantly increase risk for a condition. Carrier status indicates you carry one or more copies of a risk allele but does not mean you will develop the condition. Penetrance varies by variant. Consult a genetic counselor for clinical interpretation.

What is a Polygenic Risk Score?

A polygenic risk score aggregates the effect of many genetic variants into a single number reflecting genetic predisposition for a trait. Higher scores generally indicate greater genetic predisposition, but genetics is only one factor. Lifestyle, environment, and medical history all play important roles. A high PRS does not mean you will develop a condition.

Percentile & Odds Ratio Estimates

Percentile values are estimated against a reference population of PGP participants matched to your inferred ancestry. Odds ratios reflect relative risk compared to the middle decile of the reference population. These are statistical estimates and exact numbers carry uncertainty. They should not be interpreted as precise personal risk predictions.

Ancestry Limitation

All polygenic scores in this report were trained on European-ancestry data from the UK Biobank (predominantly white British participants). Percentile estimates are calibrated against a European-ancestry PGP reference population (n=119). For individuals of non-European ancestry, scores, percentiles, and risk estimates are likely to be less accurate and may not reflect true genetic predisposition. The odds ratio bins from Tanigawa et al. were also derived from the same European-ancestry cohort. Use this report with extra caution if you are not of European ancestry.

Not a Clinical Test

This report is for research and educational purposes only. It is not a clinical diagnostic test. Consult a healthcare provider or genetic counselor before making any health decisions based on this information.

Methodology

Input processing: Raw consumer genotyping data is normalized into a standardized variant format and aligned to the GRCh37 (hg19) human reference genome. Quality checks are applied to filter low-confidence calls and ensure compatibility with downstream analysis.

Imputation: Consumer genotyping arrays typically capture 600,000–700,000 variants. To fill in the millions of variants not directly measured, we perform genome-wide statistical imputation using a large, ethnically diverse reference panel. This process infers likely genotypes at untyped positions based on patterns of linkage disequilibrium observed in reference populations, expanding coverage to approximately 30 million variants across all 22 autosomes. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data already covers the full genome and does not require imputation.

Ancestry inference: Your genetic ancestry is estimated by comparing your genotype profile to reference populations spanning five major continental superpopulations (European, African, East Asian, South Asian, and Admixed American). A machine learning classifier trained on thousands of reference samples assigns the most likely ancestry group, which is used to select the appropriate reference distribution for percentile estimation.

Polygenic risk score calculation: Polygenic risk scores are computed by combining the effects of many genetic variants, each weighted according to its published association with a given trait. Scoring weights are sourced from the PGS Catalog, an open database of published polygenic scores. Each variant in your imputed genotype data is matched against the scoring file and the weighted sum is calculated to produce a single composite score per trait.

Percentile and risk estimation: Your raw score for each trait is compared against an empirical reference distribution to determine your percentile ranking. Relative risk (odds ratios) are estimated by mapping your score to population-level decile bins derived from large-scale biobank research. These estimates are stratified by inferred genetic ancestry to improve accuracy.

Frequently Asked Questions
  • My report says I have a higher genetic tendency for a trait, but that doesn't match me at all. Why?
    Polygenic risk scores capture genetic predisposition, not destiny. Many traits are shaped by a combination of genetics, environment, lifestyle, diet, and chance. A high score means your DNA nudges you in that direction compared to average, but plenty of people with high scores never develop a condition and vice versa. Think of it as one piece of a larger puzzle.
  • Does a high risk score mean I'm going to get a disease?
    No. A higher score means you may have a greater genetic predisposition, but it is not a diagnosis or a guarantee. Most common diseases are influenced by many factors beyond genetics, including age, lifestyle, family history, and preventive care. Many people with elevated scores never develop the condition.
  • Should I change my medication or start new treatment based on this report?
    No. This report is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not a clinical test and should never replace advice from a healthcare provider. Do not start, stop, or change any medication based on these results. If something in this report concerns you, bring it to your doctor or a genetic counselor for a proper clinical evaluation.
  • Why doesn't my height / BMI / blood pressure match the score?
    For continuous traits like height or blood pressure, the score reflects your genetic tendency — not a measurement of your actual value. Your real-world measurement is the result of genetics plus everything else: nutrition, exercise, medications, aging, and more. It is completely normal for your actual measurement to differ from what your genetics alone would predict.
  • What does "percentile" mean in this report?
    Your percentile tells you where your score falls compared to a reference population. For example, a 75th percentile means your genetic score is higher than approximately 75% of people in the reference group. It does not mean you have a 75% chance of anything — it is a ranking, not a probability.
  • Are these results accurate for all ethnicities?
    The scores in this report were developed using data primarily from people of European ancestry (UK Biobank). They may be less accurate for individuals of other ancestral backgrounds. Polygenic scores generally transfer less well across populations due to differences in allele frequencies and linkage patterns. We display your inferred ancestry at the top of the report for transparency.
  • Can I share this report with my doctor?
    Yes, you are welcome to share this report with your healthcare provider. It can serve as a conversation starter about your genetic background. However, your doctor will likely want to consider your full medical history, family history, and possibly order clinical-grade genetic testing before making any medical decisions.
  • Why are some traits missing from my report?
    A trait may be excluded if too few of its required genetic variants were found in your data after imputation. Each score requires a minimum overlap with the published variant list to produce reliable results. Excluded traits (if any) are listed near the bottom of the report.
  • How is this different from a clinical genetic test?
    Clinical genetic tests are performed in certified laboratories under strict quality controls (such as CLIA/CAP accreditation) and are interpreted by trained geneticists. This report uses consumer genotyping data and publicly available risk scores for research and educational purposes. It has not been validated for clinical decision-making.
  • Will my scores change if I get re-tested?
    Your DNA does not change, so the raw genetic data would be the same. However, scores could shift slightly if the analysis uses an updated scoring model, different imputation panel, or a larger reference population. The underlying science of polygenic scores is still evolving, and newer models may give somewhat different estimates.